Samsung 990 Pro & Samsung 970 Evo Plus share many similarities, but there are also important differences, such as quality, performance, features, design, and connectivity. If you want the best one between them, I Would recommend the Samsung 990 Pro rather than the Samsung 970 Evo Plus.

Why Do I Recommend The Samsung 990 Pro?
- The Samsung 990 Pro has a PCIe 4.0 x4 interface for nearly double bandwidth and faster data throughput in modern systems, while the Samsung 970 Evo Plus uses a PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
- The Samsung 990 Pro features up to 7,450 MB/s sequential read speeds to significantly reduce game load times and large file access delays, whereas the Samsung 970 Evo Plus has up to 3,500 MB/s sequential read speeds.
- The Samsung 990 Pro comes with up to 6,900 MB/s sequential write performance for much faster large file transfers and content exports, compared to the Samsung 970 Evo Plus which has up to 3,300 MB/s sequential write speeds.
- The Samsung 990 Pro includes a newer-generation controller for higher random IOPS and smoother multitasking under heavy workloads, while the Samsung 970 Evo Plus uses an older controller with lower random performance limits.
- The Samsung 990 Pro supports NVMe 2.0 for improved command handling efficiency and lower latency in advanced workloads, whereas the Samsung 970 Evo Plus supports NVMe 1.3.
- The Samsung 990 Pro features improved power efficiency per performance level to deliver higher speeds without proportional increases in power consumption, compared to the Samsung 970 Evo Plus which is less efficient at peak performance.
- The Samsung 990 Pro supports higher sustained performance for demanding tasks like video editing and large game installs, while the Samsung 970 Evo Plus reaches its performance ceiling sooner due to PCIe 3.0 limitations.
- The Samsung 990 Pro comes in higher maximum capacity options up to 4TB for larger game libraries and professional data storage, whereas the Samsung 970 Evo Plus is limited to lower maximum capacities.
Maybe the Samsung 970 Evo Plus price can make you comfortable because it’s a little bit cheaper than the Samsung 990 Pro. But you have to compromise all the above-mentioned features. Now the Decision is Yours. I hope it was helpful to choose the right one.
Side By Side Comparison
| Feature | Samsung 990 Pro | Samsung 970 Evo Plus |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| NVMe version | NVMe 2.0 | NVMe 1.3 |
| Seq. read (max) | Up to 7,450 MB/s | Up to 3,500 MB/s |
| Seq. write (max) | Up to 6,900 MB/s | Up to 3,300 MB/s |
| Random read (max) | Up to 1,400K IOPS | Up to 620K IOPS |
| Random write (max) | Up to 1,550K IOPS | Up to 560K IOPS |
| Controller | Samsung Pascal | Samsung Phoenix |
| Heatsink option | Yes | No |
| Power efficiency | Higher | Lower |
| DirectStorage readiness | Better suited | Less suited |
| Peak power draw | Higher | Lower |
| Typical temps (load) | Higher | Lower |
| PCIe 3.0 behavior | Runs at PCIe 3.0 speeds | Native PCIe 3.0 speeds |
| Supported capacities | 1TB / 2TB / 4TB | 250GB / 500GB / 1TB / 2TB |
| Firmware generation | Newer | Older |
| Performance ceiling | Gen4-class | Gen3-class |
| Price | Check 990 Pro Price | Check 970 Evo Plus Price |
Common Features
| Feature | Samsung 990 Pro | Samsung 970 Evo Plus |
| Form factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| NAND type | 3-bit TLC V-NAND | 3-bit TLC V-NAND |
| DRAM cache | Yes | Yes |
| TRIM support | Yes | Yes |
| S.M.A.R.T. support | Yes | Yes |
| AES 256-bit encryption | Yes | Yes |
| TCG Opal support | Yes | Yes |
| Windows compatibility | Yes | Yes |
| Linux compatibility | Yes | Yes |
| Samsung Magician support | Yes | Yes |
| Low-power idle states | Yes | Yes |
| Shock resistance | Yes | Yes |
| Vibration resistance | Yes | Yes |
| Wear-leveling support | Yes | Yes |
| Garbage collection | Yes | Yes |
| Thermal monitoring | Yes | Yes |
| Client SSD class | Yes | Yes |
| Price | Check 990 Pro Price | Check 970 Evo Plus Price |